Optimizing N Reduction Hyperlinks for the Non-Believers.........
Energy Consumption for N reduction, Tri-W System flunks even without adding in the energy to lift all that water uphill to the 'Bogus'derson giant leachfield ( like the one in your yard but bigger and waaay uphill):
http://www.iwaponline.com/wst/04801/0037/048010037.pdf
EPA Federal is on board, what's wrong with these State guys:
http://www.epa.gov/ORD/NRMRL/pubs/625r00008/html/tfs9.htm
Full EPA site for on site treatment:
http://www.epa.gov/ORD/NRMRL/Pubs/625R00008/625R00008.htm
Small Flows Clearinghouse:
http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/nsfc/nsfc_index.htm
NSF Certified Products:
http://www.nsf.org/Certified/Common/Company.asp?Program=WSTWTR
NSF Ruling Standard- Standard 40 Discussion/Intro:
http://www.nsf.org/business/newsroom/regworld01-3/rw_page4.html
Scarry Energy Stuff:
http://www.npg.org/specialreports/bartlett_index.htm
http://www.oilcrisis.com/experts/
Same Poop- Double Standard. No disposal after 2010 for Homeowners- Sewer plant allowed to to recharge groundwater at 7mg/l Nitrogen with 'no measurable improvement for 30 years'. Your land is being stolen from you by punitive manipulation of the Porter Cologne Act. It has nothing to do with law or EPA guidelines. Be sure to send in your objection.
http://www.iwaponline.com/wst/04801/0037/048010037.pdf
EPA Federal is on board, what's wrong with these State guys:
http://www.epa.gov/ORD/NRMRL/pubs/625r00008/html/tfs9.htm
Full EPA site for on site treatment:
http://www.epa.gov/ORD/NRMRL/Pubs/625R00008/625R00008.htm
Small Flows Clearinghouse:
http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/nsfc/nsfc_index.htm
NSF Certified Products:
http://www.nsf.org/Certified/Common/Company.asp?Program=WSTWTR
NSF Ruling Standard- Standard 40 Discussion/Intro:
http://www.nsf.org/business/newsroom/regworld01-3/rw_page4.html
Scarry Energy Stuff:
http://www.npg.org/specialreports/bartlett_index.htm
http://www.oilcrisis.com/experts/
Same Poop- Double Standard. No disposal after 2010 for Homeowners- Sewer plant allowed to to recharge groundwater at 7mg/l Nitrogen with 'no measurable improvement for 30 years'. Your land is being stolen from you by punitive manipulation of the Porter Cologne Act. It has nothing to do with law or EPA guidelines. Be sure to send in your objection.
posted by Steve Paige at 8:23:00 AM
2 Comments:
Again, if you would be so kind as to explain how your proposed system reduces nitrates, I would be appreciative. In a quick scan of your 500 pages worth of linked documents I didn't see that issue jump out.
Sharkey, second link:(Technology Fact Sheet 11). Enhanced nitrogen removal systems can be categorized by their mode of removal. Wastewater separation systems, which remove toilet wastes and garbage grinding, are capable of 80 to 90 percent nitrogen removal. Physical-chemical systems such as ion exchange, volatilization, and membrane processes, are capable of similar removal rates. Ion exchange resins remove NH4-N or NO3- N. Membrane processes employ a variety of membranes and pressures that all have a significant reject flow rate.
I'm still reading through it,
Steve, would you be interested in a trial project?
Post a Comment
<< Home